On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Atro Tossavainen <[email protected]> wrote: > Derrick Brashear wrote: > >> CellAliases file is your friend, and ameliorates this argument. >> >> I'd guess you're actually content with dynroot, and don't know it yet. ;) > > I'm getting the impression that doing that would be replacing a bit of > configuration that's currently global and in AFS itself with something > that is per-client and in a file on each client.
CellAliases would be a distributed file, just as CellServDB is, but, you have a point. > I'm not sure yet > this is a good idea. On the other hand, I do acknowledge the choice > to attach the client to a particular cell rather than dynroot is also > a configuration item in a local file on each client. That too. > How does this affect authenticating logins against AFS? (Yes, spare > me the argument against kaserver. I *know*. We might not be using > AFS by the end of this year anyway, The Them want to replace it with > SMB/CIFS/NFSv4/whatever.) It doesn't affect it positively, negatively, or sidelong. Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
