--On Friday, May 22, 2009 02:36:45 PM -0500 "Douglas E. Engert"
<[email protected]> wrote:
I would suspect that the RX_REMOTE_PACKET_SIZE should at least be based
on the smallest MTU of any interface that might be used.
That seems like a reasonable thing to do, in the case where we cannot tell
which interface will be used and cannot do PMTU discovery (which, sadly, is
non-trivial for user-mode UDP users on many UNIX platforms)
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
