On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Derrick Brashear<[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Could you clarify which of the DAFS bugs you are concerned about? >> Several of the more serious DAFS bugs have had patches submitted over >> the past few months.. > > The ones we don't know about. I'll recheck but I don't think any of the > listed issues is a show stopper. The real issue is the code as-is has had > very little testing. Patches based on it, applied to other trees, have, but > that's not really testing I'd want to put faith in for a new stable series. >
So you're comfortable with a 1.6, including DAFS, with the set of known issues, as long as testing of the actual HEAD occurs? That would be a very helpful statement. Thanks, Steven Jenkins End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
