Hi Russ, I appreciate it that you're giving some consideration the issue (of out-of-tree maintenance cost). I have felt this pain a lot over the last few months, and, with rxk5, it's been a multi-year process...
Matt ----- "Russ Allbery" <[email protected]> wrote: > > This means that maintaining a large monolithic patch set outside of > the > tree is going to require constant and significant rebasing. You want > to > get self-contained portions of it into the tree as soon as possible > so > that everyone shares the work instead of having to keep it current > outside > the tree. > > Also, we may be doing some global cleanups in the future. We'll try > to > warn everyone in advance and discuss that on the list, particularly if > it > will cause significant problems for pending out-of-tree patches. > > -- > Russ Allbery ([email protected]) > <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
