Hi Jeff, I agree with you. I should not have implied this. I think some variation on the begin/end transactional style Tom elaborated is the same notion as the "reservation-based" model I have considered would be necessary to provide stronger semantics in general, but certainly also on OSDs.
Matt ----- "Jeffrey Altman" <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt: > > I disagree with you that it is possible to negotiate the semantics of > the meaning of a data version (DV) within the AFS protocol. If a DV > was > a value that only had meaning within the confines of the CM->FS > communication I would agree with you, but it doesn't. -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
