Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> In AFS semantics, sure.  Those are not the only ones available, right?
Since we are discussing AFS and anything we do must inter operate, then
anything we adopt (in my opinion) needs to be compatible with the AFS3
semantics that are required for communicating between existing clients
and servers. 

Jeffrey Altman


_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to