In message <[email protected]>,Jeffrey Hutzelman writes: >> backwards compat for older programs (and users) that might look at >> your group list to determine if you have a pag (for whatever reason). >> obviously this will be somewhat confusing to a thread process. >> this feature should go away since it exposes the pag value. > >That's not why I'd make it go away. The pag value is not a secret.
i think it should be treated as a secret. the current workaround to prevent pag collision (and a brute force attack) it to sleep before/after issuing a pag since it is a simple increment. regardless, i dont think people and making their own api (which involves coping these groups) and then complaining when we 'break' something by changing our behavior. if they dont like the current api, they should ask for changes. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
