On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:36:10 -0400 Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sure, even sans-framework having tests is valuable, but until we have > a framework, taking them now means more work later when we get > something to fit them into. Do we want a discussion on a new framework before writing tests and such? I don't want to argue for something I don't have time to implement *now*, but I already have an image in my mind of what I am working towards whenever I write a test for something. I'm wondering how bad it is if my ideas for a framework clash with someone else's... but at the same time I get the feeling that if I submitted a working, intuitive framework with tests, it would be at least somewhat welcomed as something better than the existing src/tests/, almost no matter what it was. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
