On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:09:07 -0500 "Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> In message <[email protected]>,Chaz Chandler writes: > >I think you could argue that from a business perspective, but let's > >not pull the rug out from under it prematurely. It's working great > >now. Derrick and others just completed a good bit of work in 1.5 to > >allow it > > fine. but that doesnt mean it needs to be supported beyond that > release. if you want to continue to run irix 6.5 you will be stuck on > an older release of openafs (that will be bug fixes perhaps but not > new features). Is there anything problematic about keeping around irix support? Keeping another platform around in general is always at least a little bit of work, but I'm not aware of any changes that we want to make but are being held back by supporting irix... -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
