On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:00:00 -0500 Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since we base it off of the writeTidCounter, which is always a very > low positive number, it will always be below any active write > transaction ...until the tidCounter wraps around and becomes negative, that is. Which is why this was seen after that happens. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
