--On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 07:41:46 PM +0100 Simon Wilkinson
<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm currently toying with splitting up the hugely monolithic rx.c file
into smaller files, with one file for each structure and function that's
currently overloaded into rx.c (so rx_service.c, rx_conn.c, rx_call.c and
so on). Before I do so, I'd be interested in hearing screams of pain from
people who are currently maintaining external patch trees against rx, and
who would be affected by such a code reorganisation.
Speak now or forever ...
I prefer to speak forever. :-)
No objections on this point, though.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
