On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:43:33 -0400 (EDT) Geoffrey Thomas <geo...@mit.edu> wrote:
> It's not really clear to me that POSIX permits access(F_OK) to return > EACCES if all the directories up to that point are searchable (i.e., > "l"), and either way the cache-dependent behavior of 0 vs. EACCES is > confusing. It should give you an EACCES, but it doesn't. This issue has been known for awhile, though not everything about it is yet fully understood. Just changing the CM to return EACCES in this case causes some things to break, so it's just been left as-is for now. See: - RT 126216 - This thread: <https://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-devel/2010-January/017276.html> - Commits cda65cda6e60e76be3b546adf9096cb25a7de14e and 82124f7e85594dabdde218db5a62761d694864ba . You could try cda65c if it still applies, and see if it does what you want. -- Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.net _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
