On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2011 00:48:54 -0400 > Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't think it's been an issue before at all, and so it's simply not >> been on the radar. >> That said, I wonder if the site in question uses btrfs? I seem to >> recall there were >> some dodgy btrfs patches a while ago which diddled with journal state. > > btrfs on rhel4 / 2.6.9? I wouldn't think so :). And I already know the 2 > FSs involved are ext3...
there were btrfs patches for 2.6.9. thing i wasn't sure of was if those patches touched outside of btrfs, i got that none of the filesystems in play were btrfs. simon's answer is more plausible anyway. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
