Hi, I don't think that's what Troy meant.
At any rate, he -might- have meant he presumed there would be no interest in standardizing rxk5 unless it turned out to be something that a significant number of real sites wanted to use. Matt ----- "Gary Buhrmaster" <gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Troy Benjegerdes <ho...@hozed.org> > wrote: > .... > > What are the missing pieces needed to deploy RxK5? > > I am going to start with the assumption that it will not > > pass the standards process until after there are several > > people running it in production. > > Please read https://www.ietf.org/about/process-docs.html > Standards are not "I am running it in production, bless it now", > it is more like a long term negotiation (with a lot of work > along the way). -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
