In message <20130808153007.65523b12.adea...@sinenomine.net>,Andrew Deason writes: >I mean, regardless of what solution we end up with, how much testing is >anyone really going to do for bozo on LINUX24? We're just going to end >up with something that theoretically works but we're not very confident >has solved various possible race conditions or whatnot. If we want to >keep LINUX24 for this, we should at least put a big warning on it that >mentions something involving the relevant issues.
Since people seemed to think it was important the bosserver run correctly on LINUX24 kernels (i.e. LinuxThreads) I did make an install of Centos 4.<whatever> and tested briefly against that. I only built the bosserver bits I needed though and used some simply dummy programs to simulate the the server processes. >That doesn't deal with any signalling specifics, but keep in mind our >current bozo signal handling is not always great, and does not >necessarily need to be fixed at the same time. I've always seen bozo >misidentify core dumps, which I thought was due to this, but I've never >really cared. Yes, that is fairly annoying but then again it happens kind of rarely. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
