<<On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:41:35 -0500, Andrew Deason <adea...@sinenomine.net> said:
> This should expand to something like > for (tcall = ((struct rx_queue*)(&rx_incomingCallQueue))->next, > ncall = ((struct rx_queue*)tcall)->next; > tcall != &rx_incomingCallQueue; > tcall = ncall, ncall = ((struct rx_queue*)tcall)->next) It's unfortunate that these macros are written in this style; the casts make program analysis more difficult. (The 4.4BSD queue(3) macros are much cleaner in this regard, as well as more flexible.) -GAWollman _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
