On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:48:52 -0400 (EDT) Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are probably more things that didn't make it into my notes. If > you remember any, please chime in. It was mentioned briefly on Wednesday night that it would be really nice if people could be notified of new bugs submitted to RT, without needing to receive email on every interaction with every ticket in RT. It would also be nice if such people could do so without needing to ask an administrator (if they could just sign up for a list). It's hard to tell what our RT is specifically capable of without having the rights to modify scrips (I'm not sure how this varies from different RT versions, or if there are other restrictions, etc...), but this, for exmaple, seems to indicate that the base functionality is not difficult: <http://kb.mit.edu/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=12812726> If we had that pointed to a mailman list, it would IMO make public bug reports more visible and much easier for developers to know about them quickly. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
