Yeah, I should clarify from my post a minute ago, I am running it on an smp box.
and I did use a clean (read non-redhat) kernel (2.4.5).

Corey

Erik J Burckart wrote:

From my experience you have to recompile and use a non-rh kernel from kernel.org.
This is only the case for rh71 smp machines.  Plz correct me if I am wrong. :-)

-E

"Nordwall, Douglas J" wrote:

> alrighty, here's the issue. regular default install of redhat 7.1. I made a
> filesystem reiserfs, but that should not really be an issue, since it's not
> touching anything afs (it's /var/www, but that's irrelevant). Anyways. I tried
> installing with the rpm. It installs just fine, completely smooth. I edit
> /usr/vice/etc/ThisCell, and take out all the extraneous entries in
> /usr/vice/etc/CellServDB (we only need msrc.pnl.gov, which is not quite correct,
> but anyways..). I doublecheck I have /lib/security/libafs.so symlinked right,
> and that i hvae the right kernel module available. All there.
>
> So I start it...it runs! yea! Alright, now, to get some tokens..klog <user>..it
> works! type in toeksn, I have the correct tokens. ls /afs .....hang. when I say
> hang, I mean it hangs the shell. new xterm for me. so I try again, listing
> something a little deeper..no go, still hangs...
>
> nothing in the logs of note, just hangs...
>
> any ideas? I should note that this only happens on smp machines. same thing on a
> single processor works fine, even with an smp kernel.
>
> --Doug Nordwall
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

-- 
Corey Kovacs               "I know not with what weapons World War III
Computer Science Dept.      will be fought, but World War IV will be
DePauw University.          fought with sticks and stones."
765.658.4761                            - Albert Einstein
 


Reply via email to