On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, chas williams wrote: > i am not convinced that rx is the problem. especially for the > vos dump. nor am i > >I would think that the ufs logging would work ok if you ran the namei > >server on solaris, but have never tried it. > > yeah, i keep forgetting to try that. the only problem really is that > migrating between the regular and namei interface wont be fun. it > would very handy though. You need one spare fileserver's worth of capacity. I'm considering it for our next-generation fileservers. -D _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disks chas williams
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disk... Nathan Neulinger
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disk... dj . byrne
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disk... Nathan Neulinger
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disk... chas williams
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disk... Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disk... Bill Zumach
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disk... chas williams
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large ... chas williams
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disk... Bill Zumach
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disk... chas williams
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disk... Bill Zumach
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large ... chas williams
- Re: [OpenAFS] vice partition sizes, and large disk... Warren . Yenson
