David Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >These are exactly the reasons that I have not used either the mem cache or the >ramdisk cache for our linux computers here. Too bad the tmpfs cache doesn't work >(yet). > Would it really be better than doing the same through ext2? After all, Linux is quite aggressive in caching (sometimes better than on-controller RAM caches), so I don't think you'll see much of a difference. And because tmpfs - if it's the same thing as under Solaris - resizes dynamically, wouldn't that make the afs client module extremely unhappy?
-- Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
