On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Ted Anderson wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:52:48 -0500 (EST) Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's also one other possibility that hasn't been mentioned. The > > author of RT (our request/bug tracking system) also has a system for > > handling documentation, called RT/FM. I don't think it's publicly > > available yet, but I'm willing to ask if we can give it a try. People > > can take a look at the RT documentation (managed by RT/FM) at > > http://www.fsck.com/rtfm/ > > The RT/FM system seems pretty focused on tracking problems.
Are you sure you're not confusing RT/FM with RT? The page I pointed you at is an instance of RT/FM; what it happens to contain is the manual for RT. The two systems have a very similar look, but RT/FM is _not_ RT. > I looked at a few of the various Wiki engines[1] and there are a lot of > them. It looks like UseModWiki[2] might be easiest if the web server is > already using ModPerl. The MoinMoin engine used by Cees' PhotoWiki > seems reasonable too, unless installing Python whould be an extra > hassle. We could discuss various features if there is interest in that. Modperl is certainly available -- RT uses it -- but my investigation suggests that, if a wiki is what people want, TWiki might be a better choice. For one thing, I feel uncomfortable with locking ourselves into something that doesn't support authentication and a moderately fine grained access control model. Comments? _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
