On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 11:07, Ralph B. Robinson (Barry) wrote: > What is a fairly large timeout in seconds? Is there some known internal > limit in AFS that determines this, or is it just an empirical finding that > timeouts of some particular size just work?
We ended up using half a day (43200sec) but we didn't have a lot of time to tune things; it just worked out to be the first acceptable balance between having things work and overflowing the masq port range that we found. > What is the exact kernel hack? I found some promising definitions in the Can't help; we were using 2.0.36 kernels, and the cluster has since been decommissioned as the grad students it was built for have moved on. -- brandon s. allbery [linux][solaris][japh][freebsd] [EMAIL PROTECTED] system administrator [openafs][heimdal][too many hats] [EMAIL PROTECTED] electrical and computer engineering KF8NH carnegie mellon university ["better check the oblivious first" -ke6sls] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
