--On Tuesday, August 20, 2002 23:55:41 -0400 Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Rudolph T Maceyko wrote: > >> --On Monday, August 19, 2002 16:16:52 -0400 Derrick J Brashear >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > http://www.dementia.org/~shadow/linux-2.4.18-afs.patch >> >> Perhaps this will be slightly off-topic, but I think it will be of >> interest to some folks. I've taken a quick stab at using this AFS >> implementation, and have it half working. There's really no >> documentation. > > which makes it only slightly worse than us? Some of us have a decade of experience with Transarc-based AFS, so we don't need the docs for that as much as we do for a new-fangled implementation :-) >> I'll also bring this up on the limbo-list. > > limbo-list? That's the mailing list for the current Red Hat Linux beta. <URL:https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/limbo-list> >> There are no userland utilities, so you'd still need vos, fs, etc. >> on a box using it. > > fs not terribly useful since this doesn't have the pioctl interface. > i'm not sure what their intention is (all /proc stuff or some pioctl > interface or what) > >> No references to *krb* anywhere. > > no rxkad implementation included. not shocking as implementing rxkad > just by looking at other code is messy and there's no docs. I'm not sure what their intention is either. The only place I've seen *any* mention of this was in the release notes for their recent beta releases. Rudy _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
