Any chance you could actually send a diff of the spec rather than the whole spec? At a glance you:
changed the version number added the patch file However I may have missed something else. -derek PS: Considering the kernel module doesn't load, I don't see a reason to worry about the packaging yet. I'm sure that, in the process of getting AFS to work with the lack of the sys_call_table they will get the modules to build. "Adler, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've also gone through the exersize to build afs 1.2.7 on my red hat > 8.0 system. I've attached the .spec and a patch file. But > as with the other posts, I get the unresolved sys_call_table symbol > error as well when I go to load the module. I'll be glad to > add an account on my system to someone from the openafs development > team who wishes to work on this problem. > > Cheers. Steve. > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
