On any platform using the namei interface for the file/vol servers, the data is normal files, and the file server doesn't need any special knowledge of the contents/structure. (i.e. linux)
ext2/ext3/reiserfs all work fine for vice partitions ext2/ext3 work fine for cache partitions -- Nathan On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 04:37, Adrian Knoth wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:20:36AM +0000, Ryan Underwood wrote: > > > Hello, > > Hi! > > > Does anyone have any experience/recommendations as to which ones get along > > with AFS? I can choose between ext3, JFS, XFS, and ReiserFS on Linux. > > We are running /vicepa under reiserfs. ext3 is also possible, but we chose > reiserfs because it is online-resizeable. So to say, we can increase > the AFS-space without shutting down the server. > > > AFS, but I am concerned that the fsck utilities for these filesystems might > > not understand the AFS structure, and end up munging it. > > This might be possible. If you'll really get a reiserfs-crash then you can > be sure that there is trailing garbage at the end of your files. > > The salvager works well for us. We don't fsck the /vicepa on bootup. > > > -- > mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://adi.thur.de PGP: v2-key via keyserver > > Ein Zwilling kommt selten allein. > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841 Computing Services Fax: (573) 341-4216 _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
