Hmm, that's a little weird.
I just did a google search for "-dynroot afsd" and
found the "OpenBSD man page for afsd" [0] which seems
to have different command line arguments than either
Transarc AFS or OpenAFS.
Yet another implementation of AFS?
Counting RedHat's own implementation this makes 4
(unless there are more?).
It's good to see there is so much interest in AFS
but would it not be more sensible to be compatible
with Transarc and OpenAFS?
--
cheers
paul http://acm.org/~mpb
References:
[0] OpenBSD system manager's manual page for afsd
http://resin.csoft.net/cgi-bin/man.cgi?section=8&topic=afsd
-----extract follows------
AFSD(8) OpenBSD System Manager's Manual AFSD(8)
NAME
afsd - AFS cache manager for xfs
SYNOPSIS
afsd [-t | --test] [-c string | --conffile=string] [-l string |
--log=string] [--debug=string] [-d string | --device=string]
[--connected-mode=string] [-n | --no-fork] [-r string | --rxkad-
level=string] [-s string | --sysname=string] [--root-volume=string]
[--port=number] [-z | --recover] [--cache-dir=string] [--version]
[--help] [device]
DESCRIPTION
afsd runs on AFS client machines. It is used to manage the file cache,
fetch files from AFS servers, handle callbacks and manage the authentica-
tion information for users. In normal cases you will not need to run it
by yourself. It is automatically started when mount_xfs(8) is run.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
