Have I mentioned recently how much I hate wide-reply email clients? > > > > The client cache works JUST FINE on journalling file systems. It is > > > > solely reiserfs that it has a problem with because you cannot retrieve a > > > > file from an inode number. Ext3 works just dandy for cache partitions. > > > > In fact, on many of my machines (and after January 6th, all 140+ of > > > > them), the cache partition is ext3, and everything else is reiserfs. > > > > File server is running on reiserfs for it's vice partitions as well. > > > > > > What's it like with UFS mounted logging? > > > > Does UFS support logging on Linux? Because that's what the original > > question was;-) On Solaris, there's a problem, but that problem doesn't > > seem to affect any of my Linux machines. > > Hey, it sounded like it meant ALL OSen :-)
He excerpted the question away. > But as a tangent, what's the problem with logging and where is it on > the "to be fixed" list (as in "when I get around to it" "when hell > freezes over" "when sun releases the UltraSparc III specs" "when MS > releases the source to NT") When we have some prayer of doing so. The same problem would affect an nfs mount of the local host from the local host, apparently; kolya can offer a better summary. We'd need to detect deadlock and unroll, I'm guessing, as the only way of avoidance. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
