"Neulinger, Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've built it, and got interesting numbers... How dependent on other > parts of arla is that afsfsperf program
well, it uses at least rx and some other arlalib-stuff ... > - it might be worth seeing if it > can be broken out, I dont think its worth it. I dont have the time. > as you have to go and also get kth-krb to get > afsfsperf built. That sucks. It should build with mit-krb . > Alternatively, might be worth providing a set of afsfsperf binaries on > the openafs or grand.central.org sites. Good idea, who fixes the binaries ? How about try to link them static and put them into a tarball ? We could use versionnumber of the arla-version we used to build it. > Then it becomes much more > reasonable to tell someone to "go run afsfsperf". I know that saying "go run afsfsperf" is not reasonable at all. But i did succeded, since we are already discussing where we should put an binary. :-) BTW, where are you numbers ? i could include them in my ugly www-page if you give me all info mentioned there. /Jimmy _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
