On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Dexter "Kim" Kimball wrote: > It seems that cache garbage collection has some limitations when asked to > fill/purge in a short cycle. > > By the way, if you're going to routinely be reading/writing large files > sequentially, you may want to experiment with AFS cache chunk size. > > WRT AFS vs. NFS, I believe that in 1) a local area network with 2) a lot of > write activity, the caching overhead of AFS is a liability. (Write to local > disk cache, read from local disk cache, network to fileserver, write to > fileserver disk.)
I think there are cases where it makes sense to bypass the cache (e.g. be NFS). I don't know how we might actually figure out how to do so without user intervention. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
