How about ext3? Does the journaling get in the way at all? Is ext2 the only safe option?
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Bryan Bayerdorffer wrote:
Setting aside the question of whether a huge cache is a good idea, what's the largest client disk cache that can be configured? I can get 16GB so far with -chunksize 18 and -files 65536, but a chunksize of 19 causes accesses to /afs to hang, as does doubling the number of files (cacheinfo is always set correspondingly).
What causes the hangs? I'm using -dcache 3600 right now. Does this value correlate to the cache size in any way other than performance?
The clients are openMosix cluster nodes, and the cache is on reiserfs with -o nolog,notail.
we don't support reiserfs for cache, period, since it doesn't bother to support unique inode numbers.
_______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
-- .. ..-. ..- -.-. .- -. .-. . .- -.. - .... .. ... --. . - .- .-.. .. ..-. . Bryan Bayerdorffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wit's End Computation Center) (Analog Devices)
"Man's chief occupation is extermination of other animals and his own species, which, however, multiplies with such insistent rapidity as to infest the whole habitable earth and Canada."
_______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
