On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, seph wrote: > Charles Clancy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Tim C. wrote: > > > >> server fs1.afs partition /vicepa RW Site > >> server fs1.afs partition /vicepa RO Site > > > > What purpose does that serve? That RO copy seems to be just wasting drive > > space. If it were on a different partition, IMHO, it would at least have > > debatable value. > > As it's a clone, it takes up very little disk space. > > Further, if you don't have it, then you'd be depending on server2, as > afs does not failover to using the RWs if the ROs are unavailable.
I was under the impression if there were 2 RO and 1 RW, it would pick them each with probability 1/3. [ t charles clancy ]--[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--[ www.uiuc.edu/~tclancy ] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
