The sites that I know about personally have used things like i386_rh60 or i386_rh90
-derek "Thomas M. Payerle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I am trying to bring some linux boxes into an AFS infrastructure and we will > likely have several major versions of RedHat linux environments (and possibly > even some non-redhat systems in the future) in the infrastructure at any > given time. (For now, all intel compatible cpus). > > The default sysname when building openafs on linux follows the standard > arch_os, e.g. i386_linux22 or i386_linux24. I had been using the latter for > some RedHat 7.x systems, but am about to put in some RedHat 8/9 systems, and > while these are still using a 2.4.x kernel, there has been a major version > change in glibc. A search of web found an archival message acknowledging this > issue > (https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-devel/2000-November/000060.html), > but that was a while ago and did not actually resolve the issue. > > I know I can change the sysname during compilation, and will probably just > add a _rh8, etc. suffix, unless there seems to be a consensus on the "proper" > naming for linux, as it depends on more than just the kernel version (at least > glibc, and possibly some other libraries). How are others dealing with this > issue? > > > Tom Payerle > Dept of Physics [EMAIL PROTECTED] > University of Maryland (301) 405-6973 > College Park, MD 20742-4111 Fax: (301) 314-9525 > > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
