Didn't the VLDB format change to accomodate multi-homed fileservers around
3.3?

I thought that was part of the 3.3-3.4 transition??

Kim
-----------------------------------
Kim Kimball


> Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Don't you have AFS for NeXT?  When we had NeXT systems in the main
campus,
> >> we just ran AFS on them natively.
>
> > That was back around AFS 3.x for x < 4.  I don't think it's still
> > supported, and I *KNOW* that OpenAFS doesn't support NeXT.
>
> Nothing's broken AFS 3.3 so far as I know.  I'm still running it on one
> system.
>
> --
> Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to