On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Andrei Maslennikov wrote: > Well, if we escape cache on the client and do a direct > copy to/from fileserver we gain almost a factor of 2 > on reads and up to 25% on writes (we used the "Atrans" > binary authored by Rainer Toebbicke in our tests).
Right, I noticed. There's an "afscp" in src/tests which basically is same idea, I assume. > Without cache on client, AFS is still some 25% less > performant than NFS. This is (fileserver+rx). Of course, > namei contributes visibly. We could probably estimate namei > vs inode using Solaris x86 on a recent pc hardware (may be > rather tricky, as the newest hardware may be not supported > by this os). You only need a console and a disk driver, right? _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
