On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Lee Damon wrote: > > Nothing else should have changed stack usage wise, but there's no AFS > > symbols in that stack trace, either. > > I don't really think this is AFS related, I'm reporting it here for > completeness sake. Of course, if anyone else on this list was experiencing > it I'd be a lot more willing to be suspicious of AFS.
Well, at least once in the past there was a not-really-AFS issue where stuff was running in our contexts that shouldn't have been, so it may have been circumstantially ours, but I think this is entirely not ours. > >> Jul 1 13:07:28 bird1 kernel: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 296 > >Do you know offhand if this has non-executable stack changes in it? > > I'm not sure I really understand what you mean by this question, or how > I'd go about finding out the answer to it. (But then, I try to stay > as far as possible from doing kernelish things. :) Don't worry about it, I can't really think how it would matter. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
