Certainly if the code is merged into OpenAFS it will need to support both MIT and Heimdal. I can't imagine that the work to do so would be that great.

- Jeff


Ken Hornstein wrote:

Is there a reason the afs-krb5 migration kit is not merged into the OpenAFS CVS?



I seem to recall from my discussion with Derrick that the OpenAFS people (at the time) didn't want to introduce a dependency on a particular Kerberos 5 distribution. That might have changed since the last time we talked about it. Note that fakeka has been merged into the MIT distribution (since it required internal MIT APIs to operate).

--Ken


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature



Reply via email to