> I've got a number of Solaris 2.6 machines running very dated Transarc/IBM > file servers. How ugly is the prospect of adding OpenAFS 1.2.11 servers > (on either Solaris 2.8 or Redhat 9) to the mix? Short of the 01/10/04 > bugs, its been relatively stable so I'm reluctant to touch much.
> There's an awful lot of bug fixes we're missing out on, but there's a huge > amount of changes between where we are and current releases, so I'm not > sure how safe it is to introduce newer version servers.. Thanks to the 2^30 bug we are running a mixed cell. We (obviously) started with OpenAFS on the DB servers, and are adding fileservers 1 by 1 (we hope to avoid downtime by shuffling to make empty fileservers 1 by 1). We are not too far in the process yet, but have seen no problems so far. We have several variants of Tru64 and Solaris on our servers and I am experimenting with PC/SATA-based servers (probably running NetBSD) because they are so much less costly. John _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
