* Sensei [2004-04-01 15:30:43 +0200]: > Sergio Gelato wrote: > >>which works fine for me. though that's just a pam module for setting > >>up a pag, and getting tokens. you'll still need the openafs kernel > >>modules and client. > > > >Amazing. I've never been able to make woody's libpam-openafs-session > >work properly, always considered it terminally broken.
[Did my entire message, which contained far more than the above statement, go to the whole list? I think I un-cc:ed the list on this occasion, to save the moderator some work (I'm subscribed under a different, confidential address, so my posts get the non-subscriber treatment). Also, I'd rather keep this for debian-kerberos, where it has however already been discussed at length in the past. The main focus is now on Debian sarge anyway.] > It works fine for me :) with this pam modifications: > > /etc/pam.d/login Ah yes, but I'm more interested in gdm (and used to be also interested in ssh, which is an even bigger can of worms where PAM is concerned). > fs mkmount /afs/.cell.name > > really necessary? We don't have a replication server... You don't have one *yet*. But having /afs/.cell.name doesn't hurt, and adherence to de facto standards is usually a good idea. Note that with -dynroot you get the /afs/.cell.name entries automatically. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
