LaTex is is. WSYWIG breaks on large documents, expecially if pictures are inserted.
I have all the initial pdf's in Latex but they need cleaning up. Since I'm travelling to remote Alaska for a month, I'll have time to separate the chapters into individual files, and generally set up and clean up. I'll be on a 14.4 line so you may not get responses, in fact I usually sign off from the afs mailer. It's snowing in the mountains here in Anchorage. Tedc -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Damon Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 7:37 AM To: ted creedon Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] AFS documentation update > Considerable progress has been made converting all the IBM docs into > both Word and Tex. > > Does anyone have a preference? Those of us who ban the use of proprietary document standards like word's would most likely prefer the more open and universally-available TeX format. I know that documents in word's format are discarded as unusable here. If, on the other hand, you are only documenting the windows port of AFS, then word might make sense. Thanks to (all the?) people who are working on this project. It sure will be nice to have (readable) updated documentation. nomad ----------- - Lee "nomad" Damon - \ work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or castle!nomad \ /\ Sr. Systems Admin, UWEE SSLI Lab / \ "Celebrate Diversity" / \ _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
