no change. but why would there be? the kernel headers in there are the same as in /usr/src/linux.

i'm gonna try to get arla to work.

<-----Original Message----->On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 09:46:57AM -0700, e r0ck wrote:
> it supposedly works with 1.3.71. but i have not been able to get the
> kernel modules going. see my note from last week, which no one answered.
>>
>> someone at ncsu supposedly has PAGs going (see link below). i'm actually
>> only in need of the client at this time. is there a way to get that
>> going without PAGs?
>>
>> here is the text of my note from last week.:
>>
>> hi all,
>> i'm trying to get just the client going on linux 2.6.8.
>> kernel is running fine.
>>
>> (new install)
>> i patched the openafs source with the hooks for PAGs from here:
>> http://www.linux.ncsu.edu/projects/openafs-rpms/
>> had to hand apply one of them...
>>
>> built the openafs source by hand via:
>>
>> ../configure --with-afs-sysname=i386_linux26
>> --with-linux-kernel-headers=/usr/src/linux --enable-transarc-paths
>> --enable-kernel-module
>
>You want
>
> --with-linux-kernel-headers=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
>
>Build with that instead and see if it doesn't work better.
>
>Jack
>
>> make
>> make install
>>
>> /usr/vice/etc/modload is empty
>>
>> so i tried copying:
>> cp libafs/MODLOAD-2.6.8.1afs-SP/libafs-2.6.8.1afs.ko
>> /usr/vice/etc/modload/libafs-2.6.8.1afs.o
>> and
>> cp libafs/MODLOAD-2.6.8.1afs-SP/libafs.ko
>> /lib/modules/2.6.8.1afs/kernel/fs/
>>
>> but when i try to load the module i get module not found. even if i
>> specify the path directly.
>>
>> /usr/vice/etc/ looks like this:
>> cacheinfo CellServDB.rpmsave modload ThisCell.rpmsave
>> cacheinfo.rpmsave libafs-2.6.8.1afs.ko rc_afs
>> CellServDB libafs-2.6.8.1afs.mp.ko ThisCell
>>
>>
>> in src/libafs/ i have MODLOAD blah blah for SP, and MP. should there be
>> a UP in there?
>>
>> this is a uniprocessor i686 P3 coppermine.
>>
>> any ideas?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>>
>> <-----Original Message----->Previous posts on this list have said "it
>> works other than PAGs" (which,
>> for desktop use, is likely fine), but I don't know what version of the
>> code this was talking about. I'd also be interested in knowing.
>>>
>>>On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:58:05PM -0700, Dark Avenger wrote:
>>>> Just curious...do we know approximately when OpenAFS (stable) will be
>>>> released for the 2.6 kernel? I'm considering moving to FC2 sometime
>> soon,
>>>> but can't unless I have stable AFS capability.
>>>
>>>danno
>>>--
>>>dan pritts - systems administrator - internet2
>>>734/352-4953 office 734/834-7224 mobile
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>OpenAFS-info mailing list
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>>>.
>
>--
>Jack Neely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Realm Linux Administration and Development
>PAMS Computer Operations at NC State University
>GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89
>.

Reply via email to