So, at the risk of starting something here, I am going to ask what other peoples experiences are with placing /usr/local in AFS and sharing among machines of same @sys type (much like the AdminGuide suggests).
We've always run that way. The biggest problem, at least on OpenBSD, is that ports and packages like to install into /usr/local (that's good) but then keep some important info about the installation in /var/db (that's bad). We deal with this manually but you really should fix the ports and packages. Other minor problems include apps that install into /usr/local but keep little pieces elsewhere (/etc/gimp). And sometimes you'll find machine dependent stuff installed into /usr/local. So it's possible, and it's certainly more convenient than keeping a separate /usr/local on each machine. But you will run into irritating problems. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
