Excuse me for being dense, (and I was in one of those Transarc training classes back in the day), but what's the harm in that symbolic link?
-norm On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 11:34, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Jim Rees wrote: > > > '/afs/isis' is a symbolic link, leading to a mount point for > > volume 'root.cell'. > > > > So you broke one of the most important features of afs, the global name > > space. Why? > > Huh? Transarc trainers specifically taught to do exactly this 15 > years ago. The recommendation was there to still use the FQDN in > all symlinks, scripts, etc. But it was recommended to have it for > typing ease. Remember /afs/tr ? > > -Mitch > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info -- Norman Joseph, System Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] IC|XC Concurrent Technologies Corporation 814/269.2633 --+-- Federal Systems Group/IT & Systems Engineering NI|KA ***** If we don't change the direction we are headed, ***** we will end up where we are going. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
