On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Moose Finklestein wrote:
Ok, seriously: The problem with "self-owned group" is that it's clunky about actual ownership. The idea of [whatever]groups is multiple owners. "multiple selfs" is just silly.
that's what i've always heard it called. maybe "group-owned-group"? _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
