On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Andreas Schuldei wrote:

so does that mean that making openafs handle kerberos 5 directly
did not make installation, setup or configuration easier, shorter
or faster?

Not really. On the contrary -- it makes it more difficult.

But having true krb5-tickets on the client-side makes single-sign-on
easier.

With krb5 I miss the robustness of ubik and automatic replication.

MIT and Heindal are single-master systems afaik. I don't know if there
are free multimaster KDCs available.

Chris
--
Chris Huebsch    www.huebsch-gemacht.de | TU Chemmnitz, Informatik, RNVS
GPG-Encrypted mail welcome! ID:7F2B4DBA |   Str. d. Nationen 62, B204
 Chemnitzer Linux-Tage 2005, 5.-6.Maerz |       D-09107 Chemnitz
    http://chemnitzer.linux-tage.de/    |  +49 371 531-1377, Fax -1803
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to