On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:20:29AM -0500, Derrick J Brashear wrote: > well, what usually happens is everyone enters their own and doesn't bother > to check, so you're doing better than most. but no, i didn't see one > either. the only disk cache and only near 100% are probably the > significant facts, but i can't think why yet. i want to get all this > worked out so i can integrate the split dcache work, but i'm not going to > do it while there are already problems with dcache.
Filed as bug id #16965 <http://rt.central.org/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=16965> Hope this is helpful. -- Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
