On Dec 27, 2004, at 6:05 PM, Kris Van Hees wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 05:52:21PM +0100, Horst Birthelmer wrote:If writebehind is turned on (what I just don't assume) then what do you
get??
The numbers won't be of any significance at all.
Correct, which is what I meant. If it is turned out, you'll get (probably)
very nice throughput numbers that are meaningless.
With the sync-on-close "on" you know how fast your client will be on a normal, unspectacular, daily usage. IMHO that's the average speed you'll have to expect from that system afterwards in production.
Correct, which is indeed also what I meant.
Oh, then maybe I got you wrong. That's why I appended the statement below. ;-)
Did I miss something?? Are we here in a client speed contest?? ;-)
Well, I hope we're not since it is pointless, whichever way you look at it.
I do care about performance numbers though, since it helps with the analysis
that's going on.
Yes, but I think we missed answering the real question in the first place :-)
Horst
_______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
