--On Tuesday, January 04, 2005 12:53:58 PM -0500 Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So far, the results using memcache are: good (but I haven't done any >> further timing tests). The results using disk cache are: bad (some >> silent truncation/corruption using Derrick's suggested patch to rx.c >> from 2004-12-22 > > are you using the same rx patch with memcache also? Yes. I haven't tried these variations yet: - keep rx patch, but with larger memcache - no rx patch, probably with larger memcache Would trying those help? Past results: - no rx patch, disk cache = oops (usually) - rx patch, disk cache = silent corruption (occasionally) - rx patch, with default memcache = slow, but no oops or corruption This is all with 1.3.77 on FC3 with FC3 2.6.9-1.681 kernel (only change: export syscall table). Thanks, Rudy _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
