Hmm.. must have missed that...
In any case, it is reproducible in that whenever the cache is flushed by hand, it will eventually stop updating again, but the wall time that elapses before a failure varies. It does seem to be consistent that it occurs most often with the volumes that have the most transactions on them per unit time.
I'll gen some fstrace data and send it along
Thanks
-b
--
Brian T. Huntley, Manager of Network Operations
Office of Information Technology
Clarkson University
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 315.268.6723
"UNIX *is* user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are."
| Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/21/2005 12:11 PM |
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Brian Huntley wrote:
> Howdy folks...
>
> Just wondering if there's anything else I can send along to help debug
> this issue...
You never answered it if was reproducible. In any case, I suppose running
fstrace while this is occurring may also shed some information.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
