Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bummer. Do they interfere with other afs processes? Meaning, if I were
> to try starting up other instances of these processes with the os in
> this state, would the defunct ones interfere with the new ones?
Probably.
> man ps mentions these sorts of processes, but doesn't go into much
> detail about them. Do they consume memory and cpu time and other
> resources or are they more artifacts than anything else? IOW, must I
> reboot (for the sake of stability) after being in this state?
At this point you should reboot.. In the future, you should never
"kill" an afsd process; you should "shutdown" the afs client and then
the afsd process will die on its own.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info