On Wednesday, March 30, 2005 05:03:28 PM -0600 Nathan Neulinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One issue though would be the question of whether or not this would even be legal... The GPL/IPL incompatibility is resolved through the separation of the module. Does this problem get worse if you managed to link staticly with the kernel itself?
That's a good question. I don't think having this feature would create licensing problems for OpenAFS. However, a kernel binary which had OpenAFS compiled in would contain both GPL and GPL-incompatible code. Such a kernel could be used, but could not be distributed without violating the terms of one or both licenses.
-- Jeff _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
